|
| |
|
|
|
04/18/2006Motions filed as trial nearsProsecutors want to bar incident re-enactmentsBEULAH State prosecutors filed a flurry of last-minute motions in the days leading up to the first-degree murder trial of Mark Unger. They seek to stop Unger's defense from arguing that police determined the death was an accident, bar animated re-enactments of Florence Unger's death produced by defense experts and stop some experts from testifying. Unger is accused of killing his wife as the couple and their two children spent a weekend at a Lower Herring Lake resort in October 2003. Prosecutors contend Unger pushed his wife from the deck of a boathouse to a concrete apron below, then dragged her into the lake where she drowned. Unger's attorneys have argued that Florence Unger accidentally fell from the deck, which they have said was in a state of disrepair. The trial is scheduled to begin April 26. In one motion, assistant state attorney general Donna Pendergast argued that a state police investigator who conducted "stress testing" on the deck made a statement in a report based on a faulty assumption that a railing on the deck was broken when Unger died. The railing was broken after Unger's death, according to the prosecution. But the investigator wrote: "'For some reason the victim lost her balance and in an effort to recover, grabbed the top rail and her body acted as a rotational lever against the top rail," according to the motion. That statement apparently created fodder for defense attorneys to argue that a police officer determined the death was an accident. They asked 19th Circuit Court Judge James Batzer to rule Mark Unger's attorneys cannot argue that police concluded the death was an accident. Pendergast also filed a motion to exclude five "animations" produced by defense experts that Unger's attorneys planned to use to conduct a re-enactment of how they believe Florence Unger died. Prosecutors also want to bar defense experts who they say were brought into the case too late. They include Wayne County's chief medical examiner, Dr. Carl Schmidt, who would testify the victim died of a head injury. Prosecutors plan to use testimony from Oakland County's chief medical examiner, Dr. Ljubisa Dragovic, who determined that the woman drowned. They said that's important evidence because if true it would show Unger intended to kill his wife. See Related Stories: Unger trial promises a packed courtroom - April 15 2006 Murder suspect ordered to jail - March 11, 2006 Judge will consider allowing evidence - January 21, 2006 Judge won't dismiss case - December 11, 2005 Unger trial still months away - October 25, 2005 Unger will stand trial in death of wife - July 9, 2005 Unger hearing ends; trial decision looms - June 28, 2005 Unger's preliminary hearing on murder charges to proceed - June 26, 2005 Judge refuses motion to dismiss in Unger trial - April 8, 2005 Prosecutors' appeal hits dead end - January 6, 2005 Prosecution rests in Unger case - December 14, 2004 Unger ruling will come in 2005 - December 11, 2004 Unger hearing delayed - October 29, 2004 Doctor: Florence Unger's death no accident - September 9, 2004 Unger's defense challenges expert witness appearance - July 8, 2004 Preliminary hearing for Mark Unger begins - July 7, 2004 Was body was moved before death? - February 1, 2004 AG joins death probe - November 26, 2003 Charges in death may take months - November 7, 2003 Deaths put cops in $30K hole - October 31, 2003 Woman died from trauma to the head - October 30, 2003 Prosecutor wants kids taken from Unger home - October 28, 2003
|
|